<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Authorship on Michael Morrison</title><link>https://michaelmorrison.com/tags/authorship/</link><description>Recent content in Authorship on Michael Morrison</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://michaelmorrison.com/tags/authorship/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Fifty Percent of What?</title><link>https://michaelmorrison.com/essays/fifty-percent-of-what/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://michaelmorrison.com/essays/fifty-percent-of-what/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When critics noticed that a Fortune journalist named &lt;a href="https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/viral-profile-AI-anxieties-Nick-Lichtenberg-fortune"




 target="_blank"
 


&gt;Nick Lichtenberg&lt;/a&gt; was publishing more articles in six months than his colleagues managed in a year, and that an AI model was doing a lot of the producing, the magazine&amp;rsquo;s leadership offered a defense that has stuck with me: &amp;ldquo;More than 50% is Nick.&amp;rdquo; It was meant to reassure. It did the opposite, and not for the reason everyone assumed.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>