<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Copyright on Michael Morrison</title><link>https://michaelmorrison.com/tags/copyright/</link><description>Recent content in Copyright on Michael Morrison</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://michaelmorrison.com/tags/copyright/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>You Can't Police a Groove</title><link>https://michaelmorrison.com/essays/you-cant-police-a-groove/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://michaelmorrison.com/essays/you-cant-police-a-groove/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In 2023 Ed Sheeran stood outside a Manhattan courthouse, having just won, and said that if the verdict had gone the other way he would have quit music for good. He had spent years and a reported fortune defending a four-chord progression and a backbeat against the estate of Marvin Gaye. Not a stolen melody, not a lifted lyric, not even &lt;a href="https://www.today.com/popculture/marvin-gayes-1964-passport-found-record-bought-50-cents-2d12054121" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="link-out"&gt;Marvin&amp;rsquo;s 1964 passport&lt;/a&gt;
. At issue was a chord pattern that sits under a thousand songs and predates copyright (and Marvin Gaye) by centuries. The man was, in effect, on trial for four chords and the rhythm that connects them. How did we build a world where you can be hauled into federal court over a sequence older than recorded sound?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>